by David Spaulding | Mar 13, 2022 | performance measurement
I love the internal rate of return … Okay, that’s not a surprise, right? You probably knew that, if you’ve been a reader of or listener to my materials over the years. In my view, it should be the dominant way to present performance. Yes,...
by David Spaulding | Apr 9, 2020 | Compounding, excess returns, geometric linking, Investment Performance Guy, rate of return calculations, rates of return
Odd returns are surfacing, and the coronavirus is the culprit I’ll confess to a bit of hyperbole or misdirected blame here. We can’t really credit the coronavirus, but the markets have been extremely volatile, and whenever that happens, we are bound to see...
by David Spaulding | Mar 17, 2020 | time-weighting, Investment Performance Guy, IRR, rates of return
My colleague, Jennifer Barnette, CIPM, suggested that this blog post from many years ago be published again. I was flattered that she felt it was worthy of reappearing. She was also kind enough to do some edits. It has been quite some time since I’ve done a blog...
by David Spaulding | Oct 1, 2019 | Modified Dietz, #GIPS2020, 2020 GIPS Standards, geometric linking, GIPS 20/20, GIPS 2020, Global Investment Performance Standards, internal rate of return, Investment Performance Guy, IRR
One of those confusing things in the world of performance measurement: Modified Dietz Modified Dietz is one of the most commonly used return measures. Granted, Peter Dietz probably never referred to it as “Modified” (he called it...
by David Spaulding | Sep 17, 2019 | composite inception date, 2020 GIPS Standards, composite creation date, composites, GIPS, GIPS 2020, Global Investment Performance Standards, Investment Performance Guy
A video to help explain the difference: composite creation vs. composite inception date With the introduction of the 2020 version of the GIPS(R) Standards, a new requirement is surfacing: for firms to report the composite’s inception date. This is defined in the...
